Kuriya v. Gautam
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant's counsel submitted that a compromise had been reached between the parties and sought permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission was granted, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the appeal is granted; the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:25196]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 230/2022
- Kuriya S/o Mengji Patidar, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Khera Pas Khadgada, Tehsil Sagwara District Dungarpur.
- Smt. Haker W/o Kuriya Patidar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Khera Pas Khadgada, Tehsil Sagwara District Dungarpur.
----Appellants
Versus
Gautam S/o Jagji Patidar, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Khera Pas Khadgada, Tehsil Sagwara District Dungarpur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rakesh Matoria
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order
08/08/2023
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kuriya S/o Mengji Patidar and Smt. Haker W/o Kuriya Patidar
- respondent
Gautam S/o Jagji Patidar
Coram
REKHA BORANA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CSA/230/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court