This second appeal challenged a decree establishing a permanent injunction against a defendant for opening a door on alleged strip land. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the lower courts' observations that no question of law arose.
The second appeal was dismissed; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/013437]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 141/2022
Narendra Singh S/o Shri Ganga Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o C-373, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Colony, Jaisalmer, Tehsil And Distt. Jaisalmer (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
Omprakash S/o Dungar Das, R/o Sunar Pada, Jaisalmer, Tehsil And Distt. Jaisalmer (Raj.)
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vinay Jain
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
04/05/2023
[2023/RJJD/013437]
[CSA-141/2022]
(2 of 3)
[2023/RJJD/013437]
[CSA-141/2022]
(3 of 3)
not specify any strip/open land in the rear side of his plot. The defendant did not lead any evidence and therefore, his evidence was closed. Meaning thereby, no case as pleaded by defendant was found to be proved on record.
(REKHA BORANA),J
7-AbhishekS/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the findings that the defendant constructed a door on strip land not belonging to the plaintiff are sustainable against evidence.
Whether any substantial question of law arises in the present appeal.
Narendra Singh
Omprakash
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
