Dismissed

Smt. Neetu Badsara Wife of Shri Maneesh D/O Mr. Shyopal Badsara, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Apr 2023CRLW/615/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge bench disposed of a writ petition seeking directions for police protection. The court held that without specific instances of threat, it directed the petitioners to approach the Superintendent of Police via representation, rather than issuing a blanket security order.

What did the court decide?

directed petitioners to submit representation to Superintendent of Police for security consideration.

Smt. Neetu Badsara Wife of Shri Maneesh… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 615/2023

¶3

Smt. Neetu Badsara Wife Of Shri Maneesh D/o Mr. Shyopal Badsara, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Papra Kalan, Tehsil Udaipurwati District Jhunjhunu At Kpresent Dhani Bala Sagar, Ranasar, Nayabas, Sikar.

¶4

Maneesh Son Of Syodan Ram Jakhar, Aged About 29 Years, Ranasar, Dhani Balasagar, Nayabas, Sikar.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Superintendent Of Police, Sikar.

¶9

S.h.o., Police Station Kotwali Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar.

¶10

Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu.

¶11

S.h.o. Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu. 6. Deburam Badsara Son Of Shri Jhutharam ( Grandfather Of Petitioner No. 1), R/o Village Papra Kalan, Tehsil Udaipurwati District Jhunjhunu .

¶12

Shyopal Badsara Son Of Deviram Basra, ( Fahter Of Petitioner No. 1), R/o Village Papra Kalan, Tehsil Udaipurwati District Jhunjhunu .

¶13

Amichand Son Of Heeraram ( Tauji Ka Petitioner No. 1), R/o Village Papra Kalan, Tehsil Udaipurwati District Jhunjhunu .

¶14

Ashok Badsar Son Of Amichand, ( Cousin Brother Of Petitioner No. 1), R/o Village Papra Kalan, Tehsil Udaipurwati District Jhunjhunu .

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Rajesh Kumar Kuri
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	DeshrajGosingha,PP

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

[CRLW-615/2023]

(2 of 3)

04/04/2023

The petitioners have preferred the present misc. petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of necessary directions to the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are of major age and they solemnized their marriage of their own free will. However, their family members are not agreeable to their marriage and have threatened them of dire consequences.

¶24

He prays that adequate police protection be provided to them.

¶25

Though no specific instance or imminent threat has been pleaded, considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension or threat perception about their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move an appropriate representation before the Superintendent of Police, Sikar, indicating their concern with the names of probable assailants.

¶26

If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Sikar shall consider the same and after analyzing the factual situation, pass necessary orders or take action to ward off any untoward incident.

¶27

It is hereby clarified that this order may not be construed to be a validation of petitioners’ marriage and proof of their age. Any

¶28

(3 of 3) [CRLW-615/2023]

¶29

observation made herein shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives.

¶30

With these observations, this criminal misc. petition is disposed of.

¶31

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶32

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶33

CHHAYA AWASTHI /50

Smt. Neetu Badsara Wife of Shri Maneesh D/O Mr. Shyopal Badsara, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Neetu Badsara Wife of Shri Maneesh D/O Mr. Shyopal Badsara, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhu and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Babu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Roop Singh Meena S/O Shri Dharam Singh B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Nitu Choudhary W/O Sh. Nishant Choudhary D/O Ishwar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nirmum Rebari D/O Kalu Ram Rebari, W/O Bhag Chand, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rashika Khandelwal D/O Umesh Khandelwal W/O Rahul Kumar Sain, Vs State of Rajasthan