Disposed

Manju Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Apr 2023CRLW/526/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This brief order admits the petitioners' petition seeking protection of life and liberty. The Court directs the Superintendent of Police, Churu, to hear the grievance and provide adequate security if necessitated before disposing the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to appear before Superintendent of Police, Churu for grievance hearing and security provision if needed.

Manju Nayak Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/010861]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 526/2023

¶4

Manju Nayak D/o Shri Ratan Lal Nayak, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Nayak, R/o Chhur Basti Khandel, District Rajsamand (Raj.)

¶5

Laxman Ram S/o Shri Parmeshwar Lal, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Nayak, R/o Dhani Rinwa Rajiasar Meetha, District Churu (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Ministry, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶9

Superintendent Of Police, Churu (Raj.)

¶10

Superintendent Of Police, Rajsamand (Raj.)

¶11

The S.h.o., Police Station - Sujjangarh, District Churu (Raj.)

¶12

The S.h.o., Police Station Railmagara, District Rajsamand (Raj.)

¶13

Shri Parmeshwar Lal S/o Arjun Lal, B/c Nayak, R/o Kusumdesar, Teh. Sujjangarh, Distt. Churu (Raj.)

¶14

Shri Omprakash S/o Shri Kojuram, B/c Nayak, R/o Payali, Teh. Ratangarh, Distt. Churu (Raj.)

¶15

Smt. Kamla W/o Shri Papuram, B/c Nayak, R/o Kusumdesar, Teh. Sujjangarh, Distt. Churu (Raj.)

¶16

Shri Badrilal S/o Shri Kanehyalal, R/o Sasriya Ki Khedi, Teh. Railmagra, District Rajsamand (Raj.)

¶17

Shri Rajesh Nayak S/o Shri Kanehyalal, B/c Nayak, R/o Pachmata, Teh. Railmagra, District Rajsamand (Raj.)

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

19/04/2023

(2 of 2)

[2023/RJJD/010861]

[CRLW-526/2023]

The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for protection of Life and Liberty from the private respondent(s).

¶27

After hearing the parties and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Churu, who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and if necessitated, provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶28

Consequently, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶29

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶30

180-raksha/-

Manju Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manju Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khushboo Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Thakur Das Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Kumar Tailor Vs State of Rajasthan

Hasti Mal Vs State

Ram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas Vs State of Rajasthan