The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition seeking police protection for two young couples facing threats from relatives regarding their marriage. The court directed petitioners to approach the Superintendent of Police to raise an apprehension, rather than granting immediate security.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 207/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dikshant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
26/07/2023
[CRLW-207/2023]
(2 of 3)
necessary directions to the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s).
(3 of 3)
[CRLW-207/2023]
proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
CHHAYA AWASTHI /482
1 issue framed by the court
Whether adequate police protection should be provided to young married couples facing threats from their families?
Smt. Ayushi W/o Sh. Manish Goyal
Sh. Manish Goyal
State Of Rajasthan
The Director General Of Police, Jaipur
The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur
The Superintendent Of Police, District- Hanumangarh
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Chhaya Awasthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
