Nayeem and Anr. v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a criminal revision petition challenging convictions for theft, reducing the sentence to the period already undergone and waiving the fine.
What did the court decide?
Sentence reduced to the period already undergone; fine waived; petitioners on bail; bonds discharged.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:44007]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 691/2004
- Nayeem S/o Gaffur Khan Musalman
- Faim @ Kayum S/o Gaffur Khan Musalman Both R/o Khachrod, District Ujjain (M.P.)
(Presently lodged in Central Jail, Udaipur)
----Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Bathi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Judgment
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence awarded to petitioners for theft should be reduced to the period already undergone given they served over a year of a two-year term.
Whether the fine imposed on petitioners should be waived.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nayeem S/o Gaffur Khan Musalman
- petitioner
Faim @ Kayum S/o Gaffur Khan Musalman
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/691/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court