Court dismissed criminal revision petition challenging charge framing order under Sections 323, 325, 427, 452, 308/34, 341 & 504 IPC, finding no infirmity in trial court decision.
Criminal revision petition against impugned order framing charges is dismissed. Pending applications also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:39675]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 686/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
14/12/2023
12.05.2022 has taken into consideration the entire material
[2023:RJ-JP:39675]
[CRLR-686/2022]
(2 of 2)
available on record and directed to frame the charges under Sections 323, 341, 325, 427, 308/34, 452 & 504 IPC. Therefore, I do not find any infirmity / illegality in the impugned order dated 12.05.2022.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
62-/DHARMENDRA RAKHECHA
Shabbir Khan
Sharukh Khan
State Of Rajasthan
Akhtar Khan
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
