Allowed

Krishan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Jan 2023CRLR/53/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Revision Petition challenged the trial court's rejection of a prayer for interim custody of a seized vehicle. The High Court allowed the revision, setting aside the impugned order and directing the release of the vehicle to the petitioner under specific conditions to preserve evidence and prevent antisocial use.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order was set aside and the seized Bolero ZLX vehicle was ordered to be released on 'supurdagi' to the petitioner subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 6,00,000/- and other specifi

Krishan Vs State of Rajasthan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 53/2023

¶3

Krishan S/o Ratanlal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dhani Lalkha, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Matoria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS Order

¶10

20/01/2023

¶11

The petitioner has preferred this criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C against the order dated 19.11.2022 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.2, Nohar, District Hanumangarh in Cr. Misc. Case No.78/2022 pertaining to FIR No. 220/2022 registered at Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 326, 382, 147, 148, 149 and 120-B of IPC, whereby the prayer to release the seized Bolero ZLX bearing No.RJ-49-UD-0004 (hereinafter referred to as vehicle in question) on supurdaginama in favour of the petitioner, has been rejected.

¶12

The trial court has rejected the application filed under Section 451 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner seeking interim custody of the vehicle in question on the ground of severity of offence and on the ground that the vehicle in question is the subject matter of evidence in the present case and if the said vehicle is released from custody, there would be high chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶13

(2 of 3) [CRLR-53/2023]

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record as well the order impugned.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner while praying for interim custody of the vehicle in question submits that the petitioner is registered owner of the said vehicle, and therefore, he is entitled to obtain custody of the vehicle. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment rendered in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs. State of Gujarat, reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283 , to contend that the Supreme court has held that the vehicle should not be permitted to remain parked in the police station as same shall gather rust and shall not remain useful.

¶16

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor while supporting the order impugned passed by the trial court, prays for rejection of the present revision petition.

¶17

Having heard the rival submissions and on perusal of the record, in the considered opinion of this Court, the interim custody of the vehicle alleged to be used in committing the alleged offences cannot be denied on the ground of severity of offence. It is also settled legal proposition of law that interim custody of the vehicle cannot be denied on the ground that it is liable to be confiscated, in case the offence is proved against the accused. As per prosecution story, the petitioner is the registered owner of the said vehicle.

¶18

Keeping in mind the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs. State of Gujarat (supra), there is no reason to deny interim custody of the vehicle to the owner or person entitled to get possession of the vehicle. If

¶19

(3 of 3) [CRLR-53/2023]

¶20

the vehicle is allowed to be kept in the police station for an indefinite period, then the value of the vehicle shall be diminished substantially and it may not remain in usable condition. In the above circumstances, the prayer of the petitioner deserves to be allowed.

¶21

Consequently, the revision petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 19.11.2022 passed by learned trial court is set aside and Bolero ZLX bearing registration No. RJ-49-UD-0004 is ordered to be released on ‘supurdagi’ in favour of the petitioner till completion of the trial on the following conditions:-

¶22

(a) the petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 6,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 3,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court undertaking to produce the vehicle aforesaid in the Court as and when required to do so.

¶23

(b) the petitioner shall get the vehicle aforesaid photographed showing the registration number as well as the chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.

¶24

(c) the personal bond of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the bond of sureties shall further carry the photographs of persons identifying them before the Court, which is with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them.

¶25

(d) the petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of the vehicle aforesaid and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make unidentifiable.

¶26

(e) the petitioner will not allow the vehicle aforesaid to be used for any antisocial activities including for the purpose of carrying narcotics which may constitute offence under the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶27

(f) before releasing the vehicle the trial court shall verify the original documents of the vehicle.

¶28

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶29

33-nidhi/-

Krishan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajan Jadam Vs Shri Ramsa Sharma Halwai

Ranjodh Singh Vs State

Pawan Tanwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaswant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Satyanarayan Mali Vs Gajanand Pareek

Sahjinder Singh Vs State of Rajasthan-State