Harlal Singh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed S.B. Criminal Revision Petition holding it not maintainable as remedy before Sessions Court under Section 397 CrPC remains available against Magistrate's order taking cognizance.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed as not maintainable; stay petition and pending applications also dismissed.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:28763]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 36/2020
Harlal Singh S/o Shri Mohan Lal, Aged About 50 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Khasoli, Tehsil Churu, District Churu (Raj.).
----Petitioner
- Versus
- State, Through P.p. 2. Chimna Ram S/o Shri Roopa Ram Jat, Dhadar, District Churu (Raj.).
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Dhirendra Singh assisted by |
|---|---|
| Ms. Priyanka Borana | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. R.S. Choudhary |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Judgment
11/09/2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision petition against an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate taken cognizance is maintainable directly before the High Court without exhausting the remedy under Section 397 CrPC befor
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Harlal Singh
- respondent
State, Through P.p.
- respondent
Chimna Ram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/36/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Managing Committee Saini Senior Secondary School Vs Roop Chand S/O Shri Devi Sahai
Managing Committee Saini Senior Secondary School Vs Banwari Lal Saini S/O Shri Heera Lal Saini
Managing Committee Saini Senior Secondary School Vs Buddha Lal Saini S/O Shri Khairati Lal
Chhota Devi Vs Lrs of Shri Manmohan and Ors.