This High Court Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging the impugned order framing charges against the petitioner for offences under the Penal Code, specifically 498A and 302/304B.
The instant criminal revision petition and the stay petition are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/012654]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 35/2023
Monika D/o Bhagwana Ram, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Jat, R/o 136, Gandhi Nagar, Barmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. PradeepChoudhary |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Abhishek Purohit,AGA |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
01/05/2023
[2023/RJJD/012654]
[CRLR-35/2023]
marriage and that too was other than in normal circumstances.
(FARJAND ALI),J
20-Ashutosh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition challenging the direction to frame charges in a trial under Sections 498A, 302, and 304B IPC deserves to be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Monika D/o Bhagwana Ram
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
