Pending criminal revision against a trial court order rejecting an application for handover of recovered money. The High Court held that since the amount was already handed over on 'supurdginama', no substantive issue survives.
The criminal revision petition was disposed of as the amount was already released on supurdginama.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 299/2022
Mohammad Yaseen S/o Shri Mohammad Hussain, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Gali No. 31, Teli Road, Ladnun, District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Naresh Singh for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Rakesh Arora | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA Mr. Talat Bari |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
18/01/2023
The present criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner against the judgment dated 09.03.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ladnu, District Nagaur in Criminal Case No.06/2022 pertaining to FIR No.312/2021 Police Station Ladnu, District Nagaur whereby the learned trial Court rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 451 Cr.P.C. requesting to handover Rs.6,95,500/-recovered from accused to the petitioner on “supurdginama”.
The present revision petition came up for consideration before this Court on 05.08.2022 and this Court ordered that for the reasons mentioned in the petition, the amount be released to
(2 of 2) [CRLR-299/2022]
present petitioner on “supurdginama” subject to final outcome of the proceedings.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that amount in question has been handed-over to the petitioner on “supurdginama”.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 is not in a position to dispute the above-mentioned fact.
In view of the above, since the amount in question has already been released to the petitioner on “supurdginama” subject to final outcome of the proceedings, nothing survives in the present revision petition.
Accordingly, the present revision petition is disposed of.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
130-Bharti/-
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Yaseen S/o Shri Mohammad Hussain
State Of Rajasthan
Wasid S/o Shri Hussain Mohammad
MADAN GOPAL VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
