Criminal revision petition dismissed as rendered infructuous because the trial was almost concluded with only two witnesses left for prosecution examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:26641]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 225/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Dr. Ajay Yogi for Dr. Ram Kishan Sharma |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP |
| Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
04/10/2023
Learned counsel for respondent submits that the trial is almost concluded only two witnesses are left to be examined by the prosecution.
Learned counsel for respondent submits that the petition has rendered infructuous.
Hence, the present petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
CHETNA BEHRANI /125
Kalyani Devi, Anita Devi, Pawan Saini
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
Ashok Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
