In an S.B. Criminal Revision Petition, the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn because petitioner's counsel availed of a declaration that the matter had become infructuous.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:W-JP: 134531 134531
[2023:W-JP: 134531 134531 . XI!!^.^, >-- -8% ,,&@& @Y '><*+ HIGH COURT OF JUDIJURE ~$2~~ FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH@T@AIPUR .-- es!ii .A,
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1523/2022
Dayaram Son Of Shri Ramphool, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Gadarvada, Police Station Kolva District Dausa (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At District Jail Dausa)
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
For Pefitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Chetani on behalf of Mr. Ashwani Kumar Chobasi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
06/07/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this revision petition as rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
LAKSHYA SHARMA I46
Dayaram Son Of Shri Ramphool
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
