The High Court held that a revision petition against an interlocutory order is not maintainable under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act. Consequently, the revision and stay petitions were dismissed.
Revision petition and stay petition dismissed; liberty to file appropriate petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/015585]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 147/2019
Dinesh Rathore S/o Late Shri Raju Ji, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 6, Near Railway Crossing, Shiv Colony, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
Smt Mohini W/o Dinesh Rathore, R/o Sanjay Colony, Sector A , Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Rajat Arora |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Abhishek Purohit,AGA |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
16/05/2023
(FARJAND ALI),J
263-AnilKC/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a revision petition is maintainable against an interlocutory order under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act.
Whether the dismissal of the revision petition alongside the stay petition is appropriate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dinesh Rathore
Smt Mohini
FARJAND ALI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
