Partly allowed

Mohammed Arif v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Oct 2023CRLR/1428/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment records the disposition of a criminal revision petition challenging a lower court's dismissal of murder charges. The Court held that the underlying factual dispute regarding the deceased's injuries outweighs the relevance of Section 304 IPC, rendering the dismissal arbitrary. Consequently, the Court dismissed the revision petition.

What did the court decide?

The High Court recorded that the revision petition was disposed of in terms of suo motu directions and allowed, dismissing the original petition filed by the State.

Mohammed Arif Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:35377]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1428/2023

¶4

Mohammed Arif S/o Mohd. Saleem Mansuri, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Pepli Choraha Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶5

Mohammed Sajid Mansuri S/o Mohammed Sahid Mansuri, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Pepli Chouraha Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶6

Asif Hussain @ Monu S/o Jakir Hussain, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Badi Masjid Ke Pass Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶7

Mohammed Asif S/o Mohammed Salim Mansuri, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Peepali Choraha Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶8

Shoyab Akhtar Pinjara @ Sukhiya Pinjara S/o Yunus Mohammed, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bhimji Ki Bavdi Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶9

Shahrukh Mansuri S/o Aslam Mansuri, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nahro Ki Galli Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶10

Arbaz Hussain S/o Mohammed Sharif Pinjara, Aged About 21 Years, R/o In Front Of Jain Mandir Near Badi Masjid Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶11

Sohel Ali Pinjara S/o Sharif Mohammed Pinjara, Aged About 23 Years, R/o In Front Of Jain Mandir Near Badi Masjid Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶12

----Petitioners

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Bharat Kumar S/o Gopal Lal, R/o Anchliya Mohalla Bengu Ps Bengu Dist. Chittorgarh

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.H. Mansuri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gourav Singh, PP

(2 of 4)

[2023:RJ-JD:35377]

[CRLR-1428/2023]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶21

Judgment

¶22

16/10/2023

¶23

01fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk ;g fuxjkuh fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vij ftyk ,oa ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] csxwa ds vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukafdr 05-09-2023 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶24

02la{ksi esa ekeys ds rF; bl izdkj ls gSa fd Hkkjr dqekj dh vksj ls ,d fyf[kr fjiksVZ Fkkukf/kdkjh] csxwa ds le{k fnukad 25-01-2022 dks izLrqr dj ;g fuosnu fd;k fd vkt jk=h djhc 08%30 cts ds vkl&ikl eqLrxhl ds yM+ds cuokjh o mlds fe= pkSd esa vyko rki jgs Fks fd vpkud 30&40 eqfLye ;qod gkFkksa esa ydfM;k] cSl ckWy ds MaMs] ryokjs] Vkfe;k vkfn ysdj vk,] xkfy;ka fudkyrs gq, dgk fd bu dkfQjksa dks tku ls [kre dj nksA eqLrxhl ds iq= o vU; yM+dksa ds lkFk ekjihV djuk 'kq: dj fn;kA dkyw ukS'kkfy;k viuh pDdh esa Hkkx dj ?kql x;k 5&6 yM+ds mlds ihNs pDdh esa ?kql x, vkSj ekjrs ihVrs gq, ckgj yk,A eqLrxhl ds yM+ds ds 'kkguokt o vj'kn us ryokj ,oa Vkeh ls tku ls [kRe djus dh fu;r ls okj fd;k] ftlls mlds iq= ds flj esa ryokj ls pksVsa vkus ls flj QV x;k ,oa gkFk ,oa iSjksa ij pksVas vkbZaA oxSjk&oxSjk fjiksVZ ij ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- la[;k 25@2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 341] 307] 323] 452 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o 3¼1½¼r½ o 3¼1½¼s½ SC-ST ,DV esa ntZ fd;k x;kA ckn rQrh'k /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 341] 307] 323] 458 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa pkyku is'k fd;k x;kA tks dfeV gksdj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa vk;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk cgl pktZ lquh tkdj vk{ksfir vkns'k 05-09-2023 ds }kjk fuxjkuhdrkZ o vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) mDRk /kkjkvksa esa pktZ yxk, tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;kA ftlls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶25

03cgl ,Meh'ku ckcr fuxjkuh lquh xbZA

¶26

04fuxjkuhdrkZ ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd bl ekeys esa tku ls ekjus ds vk'k; ls pksVsa dkfjr djus ckcr i;kZIr lk{; ugha gSA

[2023:RJ-JD:35377]

[CRLR-1428/2023]

(3 of 4)

vfHk;qDrx.k dks bl ekeys esa >wBk lafyIr fd;k x;k gS vkSj pktZ yxk, tkus dk vkns'k fof/klEer ugha gksus ls izFken`"V;k gh fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶31

05fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk bldk l[r fojks/k djrs gq, ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd izFken`"V;k ekeyk curk gS ;k ugha] ;gh ns[kuk gS] ftl ckcr i;kZIr lk{; i=koyh ij miyC/k gSA cuokjh HkV~V eq[; lk{kh gS] dh lk{; /kkjk 161 lhvkj-ih-lh- dh ekStwn gS o pksV izfrosnu izi= ds eqrkfcd flj ij pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gSa] pksVksa dk fjihfV'ku gS] bl vk/kkj ij fuxjkuh ,Meh'ku dh LVst ij [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶32

06eSaus mijksDr rdksaZ ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk lko/kkuhiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA fof/k dk ;g lqfLFkkfir fl)kar gS fd pktZ dh LVst ij izFken"V~;k ekeyk curk gS vFkok ugha gS] bl ij gh fopkj dj vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tkuk gksrk gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; lka?kh cznlZ izkbZosV fyfeVsM cuke lat; pkS/kjh dk mYys[k djrs gq, bl ekeys ij fopkj dj vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa tks pkyku is'k gqvk gS] ftldh izfr fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls is'k dh xbZ gS] ftlesa cuokjh HkV~V tks eq[; :i ls vkgr gS] ftlds firk }kjk fjiksVZ bl ekeys esa ntZ djokbZ xbZ gS] bl xokg us vius /kkjk 161 lhvkj-ih-lh- ds c;ku esa ;g Li"V :i ls dgk gS fd eqfYteku us vkM+s fQj dj jksd fy;k vkSj csjgeh ls ekjihV djus yxs] vkflQ o vkfjQ us ftuds ikl gfFk;kj tks ykBh] lfj;k oxSjk Fks] ftlls lk{kh ds flj esa tku ls ekjus dh fu;r ls pksVsa ekjh] ftlls lk{kh ds flj esa pksV yxh] dkQh [kwu fudyus yxk o buds lkFk okys lHkh yM+ds lk{kh ds lkFk ykr&ewDdksa ls ekjihV dj jgs FksA bl ekeys esa dkyw mQZ jkeizlkn us Hkh Lo;a ds lkFk pksVsa eqfYteku ds }kjk dkfjr djuk crk;k gSA cuokjh HkV~V ds pksV izfrosnu izi= esa scalp frontal region o fore head ij flEiy pksVsa vkuk vafdr dh xbZ gSA izFken"V~;k ftl izdkj dh lk{; gS] ml vk/kkj ij vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] og vkns'k v'kq)] voS/k o vfu;fer gksuk ugha ik;k tkrk gSA

[2023:RJ-JD:35377]

[CRLR-1428/2023]

(4 of 4)

07,slh voLFkk esa fuxjkuhdrkZ dh fuxjkuh ,Meh'ku dh LVst ij gh [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vij ftyk ,oa ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] csxwa ds vk{ksfir vkns'k 05-09-2023 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA vkns'k dh ,d izfr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks Hksth tk,A

¶37

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶38

831-mayank/-

Mohammed Arif v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Arif v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandmal Vs Arvind Jain and Ors.

Chand Mal Vs Shiv Prasad and Ors.

The Union of India Vs Babuta Aram and Anr.

Ram Niwas Vs the State of Rajastahn

Ramlal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rajan Chhajgariya Vs State of Rajasthan