Remanded

Devraj Gurjar v. Smt Kavita

Rajasthan HC2 Dec 2023CRLR/1121/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Single Bench Criminal Revision Petition challenges the Rajasthan High Court's ex parte maintenance order. The Single Bench quashed the ex parte order due to lack of cause of action and remanded the matter for summary proceedings without prioritizing marriage dissolution.

What did the court decide?

Impugned ex parte order dated 03/06/2016 quashed; matter remanded for summary proceedings without prioritizing matrimonial dispute resolution.

Devraj Gurjar Vs Smt Kavita — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:37376]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1121/2016

¶4

Devraj Gurjar Son Of Shri Ram Gopal, R/o Village Chhatri Vaya Gagvana, District Ajmer Rajasthan

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Smt. Kavita D/o Shri Baldev Gurjar, R/o Near Railway Crossing, Vigyan Nagar, P.s. Adarsh Nagar, Ajmer.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Jhalani for Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, P.P. Mr. Ayush Dutt for Mr. Peush Nag

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

02/12/2023

¶13

;kph@vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 397 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ] fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;&ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] vtesj ¼jktLFkku½ }kjk QkStnkjh fofo/k izdj.k la- 706@2012] vUrxZr /kkjk 125 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk esa ikfjr vkns'k fn- 03-06-2016 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds vuqlkj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us /kkjk 125 n0iz0la0 dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj djrs gq, v;kph@ifjokfn;k ds i{k esa 2]000@&:i, izfrekg Hkj.k iks"k.k jkf'k fnyk, tkus ds vkns'k ikfjr fd, x, gSaA

¶14

lquk x;kA

¶15

;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph@vizkFkhZ dk ;g rdZ jgk gS fd 'kknh ds i'pkr~ mldh iRuh mlds lkFk ek= nks fnu gh jgh gSA ;kph@vizkFkhZ Vªd Mªkboj gS] vr% mDr vkns'k fof/kuq:i ugha gSA mlds fo:) ,di{kh; vkns'k jgk gS rFkk mlds }kjk ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh dks lsV&vlkbV djus ds fy, dksbZ

[2023:RJ-JP:37376]

[CRLR-1121/2016]

(2 of 3)

Hkh dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZ gSA bl izdkj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; o lkexzh dk lexz foospu o fo'ys"k.k fd, fcuk vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds ek/;e ls fu/kkZfjr dh xbZ Hkj.k iks"k.k dh jkf'k U;k;ksfpr ugha gSA vr% fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 03-06-2016 vikLr fd;k tkosA

¶20

blds foijhr v;kphZ@izkfFkZ;k ds vf/koDrk dk fuosnu gS fd ;kph }kjk fdlh Hkh rF; dk [k.Mu ugha fd;k x;k gSA /kkjk 125 n0iz0la0 dh dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku v;kph ¼izkfFkZ;k½ }kjk vius c;ku djok, gSa] fdUrq mlls dksbZ izfrijh{k.k ugha gqvk gS] u gh ;kph }kjk dksbZ Hkh lk{; is'k dh xbZ gS] u gh ;kph }kjk ,di{kh; vkns'k dks vikLr djok;k x;k gSA muds }kjk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd mDr vkns'k ds i'pkr~ ;kph }kjk dksbZ Hkh jkf'k dk Hkqxrku ugha fd;k x;k gS] vr% fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dh iqf"V dh tkosA

¶21

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k] ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 03-06-2016 dk voyksdu fd;kA mDr vkns'k ds voyksdu ls ;g izdV gS fd ;kph@vizkFkhZ }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj tokc izLrqr dj v;kph@izkfFkZ;k ls 'kknh gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gS] ijUrq ;kph@vizkFkhZ ds }kjk fnukad 14-07-2015 dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k vuqifLFkr gksus ds dkj.k mlds fo:) ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh ds vkns'k fn, x, gSaA rRi'pkr~ v;kph@izkfFkZ;k }kjk vius c;ku esa Li"V rkSj ij lk{; nh gS rFkk ifr ls vyx jgus dk dkj.k crk;k gS] ftldk [k.Mu ;kph@vizkFkhZ }kjk ugha fn;k x;k gS] u gh ;kph@vizkFkhZ }kjk dksbZ lk{; nh xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk lHkh rF;ksa ij fopkj djrs gq, fof/kd o rF;kRed fLFkfr dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, mDr vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA

¶22

[2023:RJ-JP:37376]

¶23

(3 of 3) [CRLR-1121/2016]

¶24

vr% bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa mDr vkns'k esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh dksbZ fof/kd ,oa rF;kRed vuqfprrk ,oa =qfV izdV ugha gksrh gSA vr% mDr vkns'k esa gLr{ksi fd, tkus dh dksbZ xqatkb'k ugha gSA

¶25

ifj.kker% ;kph@vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fujLr dh tkrh gSA

¶26

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶27

AD/74

Devraj Gurjar v. Smt Kavita

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devraj Gurjar v. Smt Kavita

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tata Power Ajmer Distribution Limited Vs State of Rajasthan

Phoolwati W/O Shri Puran Lal B/C Jatav Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Babu Lal Son of Shri Maliram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Dixit S/O Shri Murari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Gyani @ Gyanendra Son of Shri Hardayal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Latoorlal S/O Khana Vs State of Rajasthan