In a criminal miscellaneous petition for quashing an FIR, the High Court of Rajasthan held that no exceptional circumstances were found to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed.
The criminal miscellaneous petition and the stay application stand disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 7637/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naman Mohnot For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Rajat Chhaparwal, AAAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
14/08/2023
The present criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of the
(2 of 2)
FIR No.290/2022, lodged at Police Station Degana, District Nagaur for the offences under Sections 452, 143, 323, 341, 354, 427 IPC.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
368-Bharti/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether exceptional circumstances exist to exercise jurisdiction to quash the FIR and offences under Sections 452, 143, 323, 341, 354, and 427 IPC.
Whether a charge-sheet filed under Section 448 IPC precludes quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramchandra Binda S/o Shri Prabhu Ram
Radhakishan Binda S/o Shri Ramchandra Binda
Devkaran Binda S/o Shri Ramchandra Binda
Ramchandra Dudi S/o Shri Sunda Ram
Raju Harijan S/o Shri Jagdish
Kamal Bawri S/o Shri Omprakash
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
