Allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition to quash an FIR involving offences under IPC Sections 323, 341, 342, 384, and 385, citing a compromise between the accused and the complainant and relying on Supreme Court precedents.
FIR No.1090/2023 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur is quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:37422]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7478/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Sharma |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. M. S. Saini, P. P. |
| Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma with | |
| Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sharma for the complainant. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
02/12/2023
[2023:RJ-JP:37422]
[CRLMP-7478/2023]
(2 of 3)
City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 342, 384 & 385 of IPC.
(3 of 3)
[2023:RJ-JP:37422]
[CRLMP-7478/2023]
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
A. ARORA /-156
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR should be quashed on the basis of a compromise between parties although the offences are not compoundable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Followed¶25
2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934
State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.Followed¶25
AIR 1992 SC 604 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satish Kumar Prajapat and Others
State Of Rajasthan
Jitesh Alwani
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
