The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous since the petitioner's counsel itself admitted the prayer was no longer maintainable.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:26258]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 710/2019
Sadhuram S/o Madharam, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aveesh Mourya, Adv. for Mr. H.C. Mourya, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
Order
03/10/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer is infructuous now.
Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Court below.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J
Ashwani/-1079
Sadhuram
State Of Rajasthan
Mainka
Shishpal Kumahar
Radha Devi
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
