The High Court quashed FIR No.13/2020 and related proceedings against the petitioner citing a settlement and a Supreme Court decision, invoking inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
FIR No.13/2020 and entire proceedings pursuant thereto, qua the petitioner, are quashed along with all pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 59/2023
Vikas Bhalla S/o Roshan Lal Bhalla, Aged About 39 Years, R/o House No. 74 Sarv Mangal Society, Lohgarh, Zirakpur, District Mohali (Punjab)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Dhanesh Kumar Saraswat |
|---|---|
| Mr. Shubham Modi | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP |
| Mr. Umesh Kant Shrimali |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
06/01/2023
Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303] .
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-59/2023]
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
119-Sudheer/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the FIR and proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in view of a settlement between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr.Relied on¶14
Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas Bhalla
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Dr. Shaloo Arora
Dr. PusHPendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
