Badal Verma and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed in default as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the second round of hearing.
Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed in default as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the second round of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/001161]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.
5417/2016
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present
For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order
01/02/2023
Even in second round, no one was present on behalf of petitioners to argue the matter.
[2023/RJJP/001161]
[CRLMP-5417/2016]
(2 of 2)
In view of above, the criminal misc. petition is
dismissed in default.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DANISH USMANI /10
Badal Verma
Ashish Sharma
Girdhari Lal
Phool Singh
State Of Rajasthan
S. Raju
Uma Shanker Vyas
Danish Usmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court