The petitioner was absent in the second round of hearings. The criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed in default due to the lack of appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/001770]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 467/2013
Amitabh S/o Shri Tamatar, aged about 24 years, R/o Tejpura, Post station Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioner/Complainant
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P., Respondent(s) Mr. Nikhil Saini, Adv., for Mr. Inderraj Saini, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
04/02/2023
Even in second round, no one was present on behalf of the petitioner to argue the matter.
In view of above, the criminal misc. petition is dismissed in default.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DANISH USMANI /57
Amitabh S/o Shri Tamatar
State of Rajasthan
Hanif @ Anif S/o Hoshiyar Singh
Anil S/o Hoshiyar Singh
Anita D/o Hoshiyar Singh
Rameshwari W/o Hoshiyar Singh
Uma Shanker Vyas
Danish Usmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
