Petitioners prayed for some relief. Counsel argued the prayer had become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition accordingly without engaging with substantive grounds.
n/a
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:26960]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3482/2018
Both residents of Gali NO.2, New Govind Nagar, Ramganj, Ajmer.
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.K. Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, PP Mr. Dheeraj Singhal, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
Order
05/10/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayer is infructuous now.
Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Court below.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J
Ashwani/-1112
Yogesh Kumar son of Shri Rambabu Goswami
Rambabu Goswami son of Shri Panninath
State Of Rajasthan through PP
Meenakshi wife of Shri Yogesh Kumar
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
