Quashed

Neelam Sisodia Wife of Shri Ajay Singh Sisodia, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 Mar 2023CRLMP/185/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed an FIR involving offences under Sections 323, 341, 380, 387, 406, 420, and 120-B IPC. The court noted a written compromise petition was filed and the dispute was of a private nature, deeming continued proceedings an abuse of process.

What did the court decide?

Impugned FIR No.133/2022 is quashed and the criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. Pending applications are disposed of.

Neelam Sisodia Wife of Shri Ajay Singh… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/004912]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 185/2023

¶4

Neelam Sisodia Wife Of Shri Ajay Singh Sisodia, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Plot Number B-11 B-12, Scheme Number 4, Krishna Nagar First Janpath Lal Kothi Tonk Road Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.

¶5

Aishwarya Singh Daughter Of Shri Ajay Singh Sisodiya, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Plot Number B-11 B- 12, Scheme Number 4, Krishna Nagar First Janpath Lal Kothi Tonk Road Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.

¶6

Soundarya Singh Daughter Of Shri Ajay Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Plot Number B-11 B-12, Scheme Number 4, Krishna Nagar First Janpath Lal Kothi Tonk Road Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor Jaipur.

¶10

Smt. Manorama Agrawal Wife Of Shri Lallu Lal Agrawal, Resident Of 255 Kalidas Marg Sindhi Colony Bani Park Jaipur (West), Rajasthan.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chandra Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Sharma, PP Ms. Aprati Chaturvedi

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

¶14

Order

¶15

27/03/2023

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

The present criminal misc. petition has been filed for quashing of the FIR No.133/2022 registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 380, 387, 406, 420 and 120-B of I.P.C.

¶18

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-185/2023]

¶19

[2023/RJJP/004912]

¶20

Respondent No.2, who is informant of the case, has supported the factum of compromise.

¶21

A written compromise petition has already been filed.

¶22

The FIR discloses private nature of dispute.

¶23

Considering the facts aforesaid, continuance of further proceedings in pursuance of impugned FIR would be an abuse of the process of law.

¶24

Consequently, the impugned FIR is hereby quashed and the petition is allowed.

¶25

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶26

(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J

¶27

RAJAT/54

Neelam Sisodia Wife of Shri Ajay Singh Sisodia, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neelam Sisodia Wife of Shri Ajay Singh Sisodia, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwant S/O Shri Shyoram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Shivlal Prajapat Son of Bhore Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Radha Prajapat D/O Shri Prahlad Prajata, W/O Balram Prajapat, Vs State of Rajasthan

Taj Mohammed Pathan S/O Shri Shabuddin Pathan Vs National Investigation Agency

Dinesh Son of Shri Baluram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Lakhan Lal S/O Jagdish Prasad, Vs State of Rajasthan