Allowed

Nitin Khatri Son of Shri Jagdish Kumar Khatri v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Dec 2023CRLMP/1824/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan quashed an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. regarding offences u/s 420 and 406 IPC, observing that the parties had amicably resolved their inter-se dispute by compromise, rendering further prosecution unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 095/2021 registered at Police Station Sambhar, District Jaipur Rural was quashed and set aside.

Nitin Khatri Son of Shri Jagdish Kumar Khatri Vs State of… — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:37922]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1824/2022

¶4

Nitin Khatri Son Of Shri Jagdish Kumar Khatri, Resident Of Ward No. 19, Panchpeero Ka Mohalla, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

Rajeeev Kumar Shrivastava Son Of Shri Virendra Kumar, Resident Of Jeewan Dhara Colony, Sambhar Lake, Police Station Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur (Raj.)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Azazul Haq
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, PP
For Complainant(s)	: Mr. Buddhi Prakash Meena

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶12

Order

¶13

05/12/2023

¶14

Present petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR No. 095/2021 registered at Police Station Sambhar, District Jaipur Rural for the offences u/s 420 and 406 of IPC.

¶15

It is jointly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the complainant that since the parties have resolved their inter-se dispute by way of a compromise, no useful purpose would be served by proceeding with the investigation and/or prosecution in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR. 3. Considering that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute by way of compromise, which is on record, this Court is inclined to quash the impugned FIR, in light of Apex Court

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JP:37922]

[CRLMP-1824/2022]

judgments of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and Dimpey Gujral Vs. Union Territory through Administrator, U.T. Chandigarh & Ors., reported in 2013 Cr.L.J. (SC) 520.

¶20

Consequently, the FIR No. 095/2021 registered at Police Station Sambhar, District Jaipur Rural, is quashed and set aside. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of in light of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶21

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶22

Pooja/593

Nitin Khatri Son of Shri Jagdish Kumar Khatri v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Khatri Son of Shri Jagdish Kumar Khatri v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muzaffar Hussain @ Babu S/O Mohammad Hussain B/C Musalman Peerjada Vs Gulam Nabi S/O Gafur Ahmad Peerjada B/C Musalman Peerjada

Muzaffar Hussain @ Babu S/O Mohammad Hussain B/C Musalman Peerjada Vs Firoj Hussain S/O Jamil Hussain B/C Musalman Peerjada

Naresh S/O Shri Tulsiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Piyush Kumar Tiwari S/O Late Shri Narayan Lal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramprasad Son of Shri Prahlad Vs State of Rajasthan

Sachin @ Monu Son of Surendra, Vs State of Rajasthan