This order dismisses a criminal miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel did not appear physically or via video conferencing after prior notices, noting the petition remained pending since 2022.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1704/2022
Banshilal S/o Ramniwas, R/o Ghati Road Malpura, P.S. Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. (Owner Of Vehicle Tractor No. RJ-26RA-7486 With Trolley).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
20/07/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners neither appeared physically nor connected through video conferencing, even in second round and the petition has been pending since 2022.
Hence, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Ashish Kumar /570
Banshilal S/o Ramniwas
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
