The High Court at Jaipur disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition by holding it infructuous as the factual report revealed no offence was found against the petitioner following investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:14167]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1684/2021
Mahendra Singh Son Of Sh. Umed Singh, Uttam Nagar, P.S. Bhiwani Sadar, Bhiwani (Haryana).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kamal Gaur, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.R. Saran, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA Order
13/07/2023
Learned Public Prosecutor has produced copy of the factual report before this Court for perusal, which is taken on record.
As per the factual report, in present FIR No.18/2021, after investigation, no offence was found against the petitionerMahendra Singh.
In view of the factual report, the present criminal miscellaneous petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Stay application also stands disposed of.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Ashish Kumar /42
Mahendra Singh Son Of Sh. Umed Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Priyanka Wife Of Manjeet
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
