This is an order by the Rajasthan High Court dismissing S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1598/2016. The court ruled that since the petitioner did not file a physical petition, no direction could be issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/000440]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1598/2016
Mushtaq Son Of Ilyas, R/o Nakhnol, P.s. Tapukada District Alwar.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
25/01/2023
;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk i{kdkj ls iSjoh dk dksbZ funsZ'k ugha gksuk izdV fd;k x;kA
vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vfHk;kstu ds vHkko esa ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Arun Kumar Mittal /80
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case needs to be dismissed when the petitioner fails to file a physical petition.
Mushtaq Son Of Ilyas
State Of Rajasthan
Station House Officer
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
