This judgment dismisses a criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous after the Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigating agency had proposed a negative final report, leaving no matter to be adjudicated.
The present criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2) [CRLMP-1529/2022]
[2023:RJ-JD:35301]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1529/2022
----Petitioners
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmveer Choudhary. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Rajpurohit, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
16/10/2023
Learned Public Prosecutor has placed on record factual report dated 13.10.2023 and submitted that investigating agency after making thorough investigation in connection with FIR No.07/2022 registered at Police Station Rajnagar, District Rajsamand, has proposed a negative Final Report qua the present petitioners.
Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that in view of the fact that negative Final Report has been proposed qua the present
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1529/2022]
[2023:RJ-JD:35301]
petitioners, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present misc. petition.
Consequently, the present criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
480-Tikam/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal miscellaneous petition should be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous due to the proposal of a negative final report by the investigating agency.
Mohd. Aslam S/o Late Sh. Yaqub Kha
Abdul Rashid Pathan S/o Late Sh. Yaqub Kha
Mohd. Fariyad S/o Late Sh. Yaqub Kha
Mohd. Farjan S/o Late Sh. Yaqub Kha
State Of Rajasthan
Mahfooja W/o Sh. Akram
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
