The Single Bench dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition as infructuous because the underlying FIR No. 11/2022 was no longer pending or relevant to the petition's prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1381/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
Order
29/08/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the prayer is infructuous now in connection with FIR No.11/2022 registered
[CRLMP-1381/2022]
(2 of 2)
with Police Station Chomu, District Jaipur for offences under Sections 406, 323 and 341 of IPC.
Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Court below.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J
Ashwani/-255
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi Saini and others
State of Rajasthan and Pinky Saini
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
