Hearing adjourned repeatedly; petitioner's counsel absent in second round. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition dismissed for want of prosecution without substantive orders on merits.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 12/2021
Sitaram Verma S/o Shri Maliram Verma, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Khetri Distt. Jhunjhunu Raj. Electric Contractor Seema Electricals Construction Company, Distt. Jhunjhunu Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
02/08/2023
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round.
Therefore, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
SAHIL SONI /413
Sitaram Verma
State Of Rajasthan
Dhansiram
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
