Partly allowed

Krishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jul 2023CRLMP/1170/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Garg analyzed three connected criminal miscellaneous petitions. In the primary petitioner's case, he declined to quash the FIR but granted liberty for representation completion by police. Other petitions were dismissed as withdrawn, infructuous, or otherwise decided without substantive opinion.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file representation with Police/SI within 15 days for investigation completion within one month. Stay petition disposed of.

Krishan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:20079]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2405/2023

¶4

Prahlad S/o Sh. Manfhool Meghwal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 7 Bkm, Teh. Suratgarh, Dist. Sriganganagar.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

Sh. Ramniwas S/o Sh. Bhagirath, R/o Manaksar, Teh. Suratgarh, Dist. Sri Ganganagar.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6336/2021

¶12

Jagdish S/o Sh. Surjaram, Aged About 40 Years, B/c Nayak, R/o Amarpura Jatan, Suratgarh, Dist. Sriganganagar (Raj.).

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶16

Ramniwas S/o Sh. Bhagirath, R/o Manaksar, Suratgarh, Dist. Sriganganagar (Raj.).

¶17

----Respondents

¶18

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1170/2023

¶19

Krishan Lal S/o Sh. Lalchand Meghwal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Rawatsar Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

¶20

Rameshwar Lal S/o Sh. Khyali Ram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Hardaswali Post Birmana Tehsil Suratgarh Dist. Sri Ganganagar Raj.

¶21

Baldev Kumar S/o Sh. Kashiram, Aged About 44 Years, R/ o Vill. Manaksar Tehsil Suratgarh Dist. Sri Ganganagar

¶22

----Petitioners

¶23

Versus

¶24

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶25

Ram Niwas S/o Bhagirath, R/o Manaksar Tehsil Siratgarh Dist. Sri Ganganagar Raj.

----Respondents

(2 of 3)

[2023:RJ-JD:20079]

[CRLMP-2405/2023]

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Nitin Ojha
	Mr. Ramchandra Bishnoi
	Mr. Shardul Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
	Mr. Rajendra Choudhary

¶31

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶32

Order

¶33

06/07/2023

¶34

Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2405/2023

¶35

The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.448/2021 registered at Police Station Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC.

¶36

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the material available on record, I am not inclined to quash the FIR. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file representation alongwith relevant documents before the concerned Superintendent of Police and concerned Investigating Officer within a period of fifteen days. The concerned Superintendent of Police and concerned Investigating Officer shall take up all the facts as well as representation, if any, filed on behalf of the petitioner and complete the investigation by considering them strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of filing of the representation.

¶37

The instant misc. petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of accordingly. Stay petition is also disposed of.

(3 of 3)

[2023:RJ-JD:20079]

[CRLMP-2405/2023]

Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6336/2021

¶42

Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present criminal misc. petition.

¶43

Hence, the present criminal misc. petition filed by the petitioners is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Stay application also stands decided.

¶44

Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1170/2023

¶45

According to the Police report, after investigation Police has exonerated the present petitioners as no offences have been proved against them.

¶46

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present misc. petition has become infructuous and dismissed accordingly. Stay petition also stands decided.

¶47

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶48

183-184-185-Rashi/-

Krishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju @ Kishore Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Geeta Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Anop Lal Vs State

Gram Sewa Sangh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhimji Khant Vs State of Rajasthan Ana Anr.

Shyam Sundar Vs State