Amit Chouhan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This order quashed an FIR under the Rajasthan Excise Act against a truck owner who had sold his vehicles to others before the alleged offence, finding him falsely implicated with no connection to the crime.
What did the court decide?
Quashed FIR No.60/2019-20 and all consequential proceedings against the petitioner under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:22507]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1062/2021
Amit Chouhan S/o Sh. Raghuveer Singh Chouhan, Aged About 39 Years, By Caste Rajput, R/o House No. 2223/7, Sector, Urban State, Karnal, Tehsil And District Karnal (Haryana).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Pradeep Shah Mr. CS Rathore |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP assisted by Mr. CP Marwan |
| Mr. Inder Singh, Police Officer, Excise | ||
| Preventive Force, Balotra |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR against the registered owner of trucks unconnected to illegal liquor transportation should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amit Chouhan
- respondent
State
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/1062/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court