Petitioners argued that the instant petition became infructuous due to a subsequent development. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:20518]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1021/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Praduman Singh Rathore |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
02/09/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent development in the matter, the instant petition has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
SAHIL SONI /402
Ashutosh Garg
Vinod Kumar Garg
State Of Rajasthan
Vimal Kumar Sharma
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
