Allowed

Balu Singh S/O Shri Gopal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Mar 2023CRLMB/993/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed the bail application filed by Balu Singh. Despite the absence of the petitioner's counsel, the court held it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. A personal bond was granted with two sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail with a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Balu Singh S/O Shri Gopal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/004452]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 993/2022

¶4

Balu Singh S/o Shri Gopal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Vill. Jetgarh Bamniyan Ps Jewas Tehsil Beawar Distt. Ajmer At Present Shriram Restaurant Imli Phatak Lalkothi Jaipur Raj. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP for Complainant(s) : None

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶10

Order

¶11

20/03/2023

¶12

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned lawyers are not attending/co-operating with the Court in judicial proceedings since last about four weeks, though they have no grievance against the Court administration.

¶13

Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Harish Uppal Vs. Union of India & Anr. reported in (2003) 2 SCC 45 observed that non-cooperation in judicial proceeding is not only punitive one, rather the Court is empowered to proceed in the listed judicial matters according to the law even in the absence of the parties and/or their Advocates.

¶14

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.651/2021 Registered at Police

[2023/RJJP/004452]

[CRLMB-993/2022]

(2 of 2)

Station Sanganer, Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 376-D and 450 IPC.

¶19

Petitioner in his pleadings mentioned that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 02.01.2022. The police after completion of investigation has filed the chargesheet. Prosecutrix is a major lady. Conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, he may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Balu Singh S/o Shri Gopal be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he will appear before the trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶24

Jatin /02

Balu Singh S/O Shri Gopal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balu Singh S/O Shri Gopal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep Singh S/O Shri Kulwant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Abdul Majid @ Addas @ Addu S/O Shri Asrar Ahmed Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijendra Kumar S/O Shrinemi Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhag Chand Son of Shri Puranram Vs State of Rajasthan

Patram S/O Shri Gorisahai Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Son of Charan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan