The High Court at Jaipur disposed of this bail application by granting bail, allowing the petitioner to be released when next available, noting the affidavit did not support continued remand.
Petitioner released on bail, to be given when next available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/007364]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 877/2023
Fardeen Khan Son Of Shri Atahar Ali, Resident Of Nojheel Toli, Tehsil Math, Police Station Nojheel, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. At Present House No. 377, Amagarh Shakti Colony, Delhi Byepass Road, Police Station Transport Nagar, Jaipur ( At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
----Respondent
______________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Jh Mh-ds-nhf{kr For Respondent(s) : Jh eaxy flag lSuh] yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,e-,l-csx _______________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
20-04-2023
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 09-01-2023 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk mls iqfyl Fkkuk VkaliksVZ uxj] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 235@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 376¼2½¼,u½] 376¼3½] 354¼d½] 354¼?k½] 506 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk&3@4] 5¼B½@6] 11@12 ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e ,oa /kkjk 67 [k¼[k½ vkbZ-Vh-,DV esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZ A
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] mlds }kjk ihfM+rk ds lkFk dksbZ tcjnLrh ugha dh xbZ gS] og
[2023/RJJP/007364]
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-877/2023]
fnukad 10-10-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij NksM+k tkos A
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k A
geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ o fordksZa ij euu fd;k A vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ihfM+rk ds dFku /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr fnukad 10-10-2022 dks ys[kc) gq, gSa] ftlesa ihfM+rk us Li"V rkSj ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) nq"deZ fd, tkus dk dFku fd;k gS A vr% izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vk;h lk{; o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr Qjnhu [kku iq= Jh vrgj vyh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gksus ls fujLr fd;k tkrk gS A
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
Rishikesh Soni/28
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner.
Whether the impugned order should be quashed.
Fardeen Khan
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
