In this criminal bail application, the petitioner's counsel stated they do not want to press the application but sought liberty to file a fresh one after the challan is filed. Hon'ble Justice Yogendra Kumar Purohit dismissed the application as not pressed, without granting the prayed liberty.
Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 87/2023
Bharat S/o Raju, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bheempura P.S. Ramseen District Jalore
(At Present Lodged In Jalore)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Mahendra Singh Rajpurohit |
|---|---|
| Mr. C.S. Rajpurohit | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sumer Singh Rajpurohit,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
23/01/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present bail application with liberty to file fresh after filing of the challan.
Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed.
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
23-nitin/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application shall be allowed when counsel has not pressed it.
What is the consequence of withdrawing the bail application without liberty to file a fresh one.
Bharat S/o Raju
State Of Rajasthan
Yogendra Kumar Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
