Allowed

Sheshkaran @ Saina v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Feb 2023CRLMB/817/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner, Sheshkaran @ Saina, arrested under the NDPS Act for falsely implicating him. The court deemed it just and proper to release him on personal bond with sureties despite opposition regarding his history as a habitual offender.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon executing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Sheshkaran @ Saina Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/004087]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 817/2023

¶4

Sheshkaran @ Saina S/o Sh. Shiv Kumar, Aged About 45 Years, W.no. 23, Rawatsar, At Present Dhani Chak 3, Kwd, Rawatsar, Dist. Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Nohar).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rakesh Matoria
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S.K. Bhati,P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

06/02/2023

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.16/2023 of Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh for the offence punishable under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that petitioner is a habitual offender. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

(2 of 2)

[2023/RJJD/004087]

[CRLMB-817/2023]

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sheshkaran @ Saina S/o Sh. Shiv Kumar shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.16/2023 of Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶21

86-Taruna/-

Sheshkaran @ Saina v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheshkaran @ Saina v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Vishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Vitthal Kumar Jajoo Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas Tanwar @ Vikas Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaspal Singh Buttar Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Vs State of Rajasthan