Allowed

Biram S/O Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Feb 2023CRLMB/79/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application, the Rajasthan High Court granted bail to the petitioner who was at large due to an adjournment where the prosecution witness failed to appear. The court noted the witness's absence was deliberate and refused prosecution counsel's request for a foible.

What did the court decide?

Accused petitioner granted bail to be on probation unless summoned before the executing court or the Sessions Judge or Sessions Court.

Biram S/O Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 79/2023

¶3

Biram S/o Mangilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kishanpuriya, Police Station Kali Peeth, District Rajgarh ( M.p.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail SawaiMadhopur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶10

Order

¶11

01/02/2023

¶12

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fcje dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&lwjoky] ftyk lokbZ ek/kksiqj] jktLFkku esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 129@2022 vUrxZr /kkjk 376Mh] 344] 366 Hkk-n-l- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gSA mls izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA ihfM+rk 35 o"khZ; efgyk gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ?kVuk fnuakd 19-04-2022 dh crkbZ xbZ gS] tcfd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fnuakd 05-06-2022 dks nsjh ls ntZ djkbZ xbZ gSA ifjoknh dk dFku gS fd izdj.k esa ihfM+rk ds /kkjk 161 n-iz-l- o /kkjk 164 n- iz-l- ds c;kuksa esa fojks/kkHkkl gS rFkk izdj.k esa ihfM+rk ds ifr us ,d xqe'kqnxh dh fjiksVZ ntZ djkbZ FkhA ftlesa ihfM+rk us vius c;kuksa esa viuh ethZ ls tkuk rFkk mlds lkFk fdlh ds }kjk dksbZ xyr dke ugha djuk vafdr djk;k Fkk rFkk mlus] vius /kkjk 161 n-iz-l- ds c;kuksa esa Lo;a viuh ethZ ls tkuk vafdr djk;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd ihfM+rk us ,d izkFkZuk i= Fkkukf/kdkjh dks fnuakd 01-06-2022 dks izLrqr fd;k Fkk] ftlesa Hkh mldh ethZ ls tkuk vafdr

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-79/2023]

¶16

fd;k gSA izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnuakd 08-09-2022 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS] var esa tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds vf/koDRkk ds mDr rdksZa dk dM+s 'kCnksa esa fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd ihfM+rk }kjk vius /kkjk 164 n-iz-l- ds c;kuksa esa ?kVuk dh iqf"V dh gS] var esa tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶18

eSaus i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk; i{k ds rdksZa ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA

¶19

izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= /kkjk 376¼2½¼N½] 344] 366 Hkk-n-l- esa U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr izdj.k esa fnukad 08-09-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls bUdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¶20

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fcje iq= ekaxhyky dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶22

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶23

Dinesh/22

Biram S/O Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Biram S/O Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Son of Shri Chhotelal Vs State of Rajasthan

Jugalkishor @ Rahul S/O Rameshwar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra S/O Ramgopal @ Gopal Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhay Vikram Singh S/O Arun Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pradhan Singh S/O Harkhyal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Kumar S/O Shyam Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan