Allowed

Imrat Khan @ Ima v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Feb 2023CRLMB/712/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court granted bail to the accused petitioner charged with offences under Sections 420, 406, and 196 IPC. The court deemed it just to release him on personal bond with sureties without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties.

Imrat Khan @ Ima Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/005760]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 712/2023

¶4

Imrat Khan @ Ima S/o Sukha, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Pokhar, Ghaghot, Police Station Chandhat, District Palwal, Haryana. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Rajsamand)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RS Rawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

17/02/2023

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.381/2022 of Police Station Deogarh, District Rajsamand for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 196 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that offences are triable by the Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Charge-sheet has been filed. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that accused-petitioner is a habitual offender.

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-712/2023]

¶17

[2023/RJJD/005760]

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Imrat Khan @ Ima S/o Sukha shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 381/2022 of Police Station Deogarh, District Rajsamand provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, including one local surety, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶21

45-Bharti/-

Imrat Khan @ Ima v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imrat Khan @ Ima v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girdhari Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaswant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramrakh Ram @ Ram Lal @ Rama Vs State of Rajasthan

Pukhraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Gebi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mala Ram Vs State of Rajasthan