Allowed

Ramkishan S/O Gangasahai v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Jul 2023CRLMB/6897/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order grants regular bail to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in cheating and forgery offences. The Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the accused on bail without expressing an opinion on the merits, directing him to furnish a bond and appear as called upon.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to be satisfied by the Trial Court.

Ramkishan S/O Gangasahai Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No.

¶3

6897/2023

¶4

Ramkishan S/o Gangasahai, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Gangadhar Ki Dhani, Tan Norangwada, Police Station Vejupada, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Dausa (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶10

12/07/2023

¶11

This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.107/2020 registered at Police Station Mahawa, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC.

¶12

The first bail application of the accusedpetitioner was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 21.04.2023.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits

¶14

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-6897/2023]

¶15

that charge sheet has been filed and offence(s) is/are triable by Magistrate. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶17

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Ramkishan S/o Gangasahai shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶20

DANISH USMANI /01

Ramkishan S/O Gangasahai v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramkishan S/O Gangasahai v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalchand @ Lalaram @ Lala S/O Shri Kishorilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu @ Sonpaal S/O Durgalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Rav Gayakvad S/O Late Shri Durgashankar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jameel Kaji S/O Shri Gulab Kaji Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishan Pyari @ Bhatto W/O Janakraj Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rachana Devi W/O Shri Jogendra Vs the State of Rajasthan