Priyanshu Meena S/O Bhagwan Sahay Meena v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses criminal miscellaneous bail applications as the fact-finding and evidentiary record of the Recording Magistrate were based on evidence presented before him while he lacked jurisdiction in that matter, rendering the proceedings void.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JP:52677]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4095/2023
Priyanshu Meena S/o Bhagwan Sahai Meena, R/o Post Sonp, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur District Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8496/2023 Monu Kumar @ Meena @ Monu Katkad S/o Shri Ramcharan, R/o Village Katkad, Police Station Hindaun City, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently At Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the evidence recorded by the Magistrate for common offence is admissible in court for trial.
Whether the judgment of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate recorded within jurisdiction is legally sustainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Priyanshu Meena
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- petitioner
Monu Kumar
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- petitioner
Mujahid Khan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/6619/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court