Petitioner withdrew bail application with liberty to file fresh one after recording seizure officer testimony; trial court directed to record such testimony.
Bail application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application after recording testimony of Seizure Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:39138]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5734/2023
Laxman S/o Shri Jagram, R/o New Agarwal Colony, Kosi Kalan, Police Station Kosi, Tehsil Chhata, District Mathura (U.p.) (At Present The Accused In Judicial Custody At Sub Jail Deeg, District Bharatpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Rathore, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Kirti Vardhan Singh Rathore Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP Mr. Mahesh Kumar SHO PS Jurhara
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
12/12/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file fresh bail application after recording testimony of the Seizure Officer.
Consequently, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, trial Court is directed to record the testimony of the Seizure Officer as first witness.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
DEEPA RANI -18
Laxman S/o Shri Jagram
State Of Rajasthan
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
