Allowed

Jitendra Singh S/O Surendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Mar 2023CRLMB/526/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC, the Rajasthan High Court considered the request for regular bail for the accused-petitioner. The court, without expressing an opinion on the merits, deemed it just and proper to grant bail on a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Jitendra Singh S/O Surendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/003759]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

526/2023

¶5

Jitendra Singh S/o Surendra Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Navalpura Colony Sunel, P.s. Sunel, Dist. Jhalawar, (Raj.) (Present Resident Sharab Ka Theka Bhatwara Chowki, P.S. Mangrol Distt. Baran (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined At District Jail Baran)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Deepika Chouhan (present in person) wife of accused-petitioner For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahla, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order

¶12

08/03/2023

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.229/2022 registered at Police Station Mangrol, District Baran for the offence(s) under Section(s) 143, 323, 326, 307 of IPC and Section(s) 27, 30 of Arms Act.

¶14

Ms. Deepika Chouhan, wife of accusedpetitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is

[2023/RJJP/003759]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-18350/2022]

innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. She further submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. She also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Jitendra Singh S/o Surendra Singh is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

GAURAV SHARMA /27

Jitendra Singh S/O Surendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Singh S/O Surendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh S/O Hari Prasad Meena Vs the State of Rajasthan

Soneram Son of Shri Sukha Vs State of Rajasthan

Girwar Son of Late Shri Ramji Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Yashraj Singh @ Yash S/O Yudhister Singh Hada Vs State of Rajasthan

Sandeep S/O Sh. Kishan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Muntajir Ali @ Ikka Pathan S/O Shri Noshad Ali Vs State of Rajasthan