Allowed

Mitha Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Nov 2023CRLMB/5050/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.16/2023 implicating offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. Directions included furnishing a personal bond and two sureties along with specific undertakings regarding interrogation and non-interference.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; petitioner to be released on bail in event of arrest subject to bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with conditions.

Mitha Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:40156]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5050/2023

¶4

Mitha Lal S/o Sh. Champa Lal Mali, Aged About 38 Years, 100 Feet Road, Nearby Bhikshu Nilayam, Rajnagar P.s., Rajnagar, Dist. Rajsamand.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. JVS Deora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Javed Gauri, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶11

Order

¶12

22/11/2023

¶13

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.16/2023, Police Station Rajnagar, Distt. Rajsamand for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is purely a civil dispute and petitioner had already joined the investigation. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JD:40156]

[CRLMB-5050/2023]

Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Mitha Lal S/o Shri Champa Lal Mali in connection with FIR No.16/2023, Police Station Rajnagar, Distt. Rajsamand, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

¶23

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶24

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

¶25

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶26

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶27

193-Ishan/-

Mitha Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mitha Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandra Shekhar Batra Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandra Shekhar Batra Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandra Shekhar Batra Vs State of Rajasthan

Salman Khan @ Gulam Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rama Ram Vs State of Rajasthan