Allowed

Shahjad @ Sajad S/O Mumtaj Ali v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Feb 2023CRLMB/466/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting anticipatory bail to a 72-year-old petitioner, Shahjad @ Sajad S/o Mumtaj Ali, who surrendered at the station. The grant is subject to conditions including execution of bond and personal sureties of Rs. 3,00,000.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on declaration of bond and necessity of personal sureties of Rs. 3,00,000 each.

Shahjad @ Sajad S/O Mumtaj Ali Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/001814]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

466/2023

¶5

Shahjad @ Sajad S/o Mumtaj Ali, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Durga Basti, P.s. Jawahar Nagar, Kota (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For : Mr. M K Sheoran, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

06/02/2023

¶14

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk jsyos dkWyksuh] dksVk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&16 @22 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 420] 406] 467] 468] 471] 120 ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] ckn vuqla/kku izdj.k esa vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr yEcs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk

[CRLMB-466/2023]

[2023/RJJP/001814]

(2 of 3)

tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶20

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶21

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶22

gLrxr ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ij ;g vkjksi gS fd mlus vU; lg vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj ewy [kkrsnkj gSnj vyh ds LFkku ij gLrk{kj djrs gq, gSnj vyh dh laifRr fodz; dj 1]10]00]000@&:i;s vfHk;qDrx.k us izkIr dj fy;sA

¶23

lg vfHk;qDr uUnfd'kksj dh tekur led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] ftlls izkFkhZ dk ekeyk fHkUu ugha gS] vfHk;qDr dh vk;q 72 o"kZ crk;h x;h gSA

¶24

izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶25

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr 'kgtkn mQZ ltkn dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl

¶26

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-466/2023]

¶27

[2023/RJJP/001814]

¶28

gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶29

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶30

Murari Lal Sharma /15

Shahjad @ Sajad S/O Mumtaj Ali v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahjad @ Sajad S/O Mumtaj Ali v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zakir Khan Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Mintu Ram S/O Shri Pooran Chand Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Govind Narayan Pareek and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Jenul Ansari S/O Shri Jakir Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Jagannath Vs State of Rajasthan

Sohan Salmani @ Shoyab S/O Imran Vs State of Rajasthan