Allowed

Aslam S/O Naney Shah v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Jun 2023CRLMB/4074/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge of the Rajasthan High Court allowed five bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail for offences under Sections 489-A and 489-C IPC. The court ordered the release of all accused-petitioners on personal bond and sureties without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Release of five accused-petitioners on bail requiring a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Aslam S/O Naney Shah Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶3

3133/2023

¶4

Shahina Bi @ Shaina Bi W/o Kallubhai, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Nai Abadi Mishroli District Jhalawar. (At Present Confined In Sub- District Jail Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶11

4073/2023

¶12

Rupesh S/o Ramnarayan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Master Colony Barod Road Agar District Agar Malwa (Mp) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Bhawani Mandi District Jahalwar (Raj.)

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶16

----Respondent

¶17

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4074/2023

¶18

Aslam S/o Naney Shah, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Peepliya Meetheshah Police Station Garoth District Mandsaur (Mp) At Present Nai Abadi Mishroli Police Station Mishroli District Jhalawar (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶19

----Petitioner

¶20

Versus

¶21

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

(2 of 4)

[CRLMB-3133/2023]

----Respondent

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5085/2023

¶26

1 Irfan Khan S/o Ajghar Khan, Aged About 40

¶27

. Years, R/o Arjun Nagar Barod Road Agar District Agar Malwa (Mp) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶28

2 Kayyum Khan S/o Munshi Khan, Aged About 29

¶29

. Years, R/o Arjun Nagar Barod Road Agar District Agar Malwa (Mp) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶30

----Petitioners

¶31

Versus

¶32

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶33

----Respondent

¶34

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP Respondent(s)

¶35

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶36

Order

¶37

02/06/2023

¶38

These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.16/2023 registered at Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 489-A, 489-C of IPC.

¶39

(3 of 4) [CRLMB-3133/2023]

¶40

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in these cases. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matters. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶41

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the same.

¶42

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶43

Therefore, these bail applications are allowed and accused-petitioners namely, 1.Shahina Bi @ Shaina Bi W/o Kallubhai 2.Rupesh S/o Ramnarayan 3.Aslam S/o Naney Shah 4.Irfan Khan S/o Ajghar Khan 5.Kayyum Khan S/o Munshi Khan are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of

¶44

(4 of 4) [CRLMB-3133/2023]

¶45

Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of

¶46

hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶47

A copy of this order be placed on record in each criminal misc. bail application.

¶48

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶49

GAURAV SHARMA /49-52

Aslam S/O Naney Shah v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aslam S/O Naney Shah v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govind S/O Chuttan Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip @ Deepu Son of Shri Vashilal @ Vansharam Vs State of Rajasthan

Shiv Suman @ Shiva S/O Sh. Birdhilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahina Bi @ Shaina Bi W/O Kallubhai Vs State of Rajasthan

Rupesh S/O Ramnarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Doctor Juber Khan S/O Mohd. Usman Khan Vs the State of Rajasthan