Allowed

Sonu v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Jul 2023CRLMB/3840/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur granted bail to two petitioners arrested under Sections 307, 332, 353, 34 IPC and Arms Act. The court dismissed merit arguments but directed release on personal bond with sureties under Section 439 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail in connection with FIR No.111/2023 upon executing personal bond with two sureties each totaling Rs.1,00,000/-.

Sonu Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:22952]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6750/2023

¶4

Sachin Kumar S/o Ram Kumar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Raipura, Police Station Bahavwala, Distt. Fajilka (Punjab). (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Sriganganagar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3840/2023 Sonu S/o Shri Dharampal Bhat, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Rajawali Ps - Bahavwala, District Fazilka, Punjab. (Presently Lodged At Jail Sri Ganganagar)

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

	Versus
State Of Rajasthan,	Through Pp ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Kuldeep Sharma Mr. NK Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Saleem Khan,PP

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS Order

¶14

24/07/2023

¶15

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.111/2023 of Police Station – Jawahar Nagar, District Sriganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 332, 353, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this present case. It is

[2023:RJ-JD:22952]

[CRLMB-6750/2023]

(2 of 2)

further submitted that the main allegation of firing is on coaccused Harish and the recovery of weapon is also from coaccused Harish. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter. The accused-petitioner s are in custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submitted that the petitioners are habitual offenders.

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners - (1) Sachin

¶23

Kumar S/o Ram Kumar (2) Sonu S/o Shri Dharampal Bhat

¶24

shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.111/2023 of Police Station – Jawahar Nagar, District Sriganganagar, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/-, including one local surety, to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty.

¶25

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶26

130-neha/-

Sonu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Narendra Inaniya @ Naru Vs State of Rajasthan

Dalip Bishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Tolaram @ Rakesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jayesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappa Ram Vs Union of India