Single judge on bail application for murder charge. High Court allowed bail due to long custody period and lack of early trial conclusion prospect.
Petitioner released on bail in FIR No.497/2021 on bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:18791]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 381/2023
Devisingh S/o Shivdayal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Janjaripura, P.S. Gharibajna, Currently Residing At Babri, P.S. Rudawal, District Bharatpur.
(At Present Confined At Central Jail Bharatpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena, Adv. for Mr. Mahendra Shandilya, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP |
| Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
Order
23/08/2023
[CRLMB-381/2023]
[2023:RJ-JP:18791]
(2 of 2)
(i) the petitioner shall fully co-operate in the trial, failing which, the trial judge would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(ii) the petitioner shall not leave the Country without permission of the Court otherwise it would amount to disobedience of the order of this Court and would be a ground for cancellation of bail.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J
Ashwani/-69
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a murder case after the petitioner has spent a significant period in custody.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devisingh
State Of Rajasthan
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
