Allowed

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Bhanwal Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Feb 2023CRLMB/310/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner accused of offences under Sections 395, 323, and 120B IPC. The Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Bhanwal Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/002027]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

310/2023

¶5

Vijay Kumar S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Nayako Ka Mohalla, Town Fatehipur, P.s. Kotwali Fatehpur, District Sikar ( Presently Confined In Sub Jail Fatehpur, Sikar)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Veerendra Singh, Adv. For : Mr. M.S. Saini, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

07/02/2023

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.103/2022 registered at Police Station Fatehpur, Kotwali, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 395, 323, 120B of IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the similarly situated

[CRLMB-310/2023]

[2023/RJJP/002027]

(2 of 2)

co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Vijay Kumar S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

GAURAV SHARMA /78

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Bhanwal Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Bhanwal Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jenul Ansari S/O Shri Jakir Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Jagannath Vs State of Rajasthan

Sohan Salmani @ Shoyab S/O Imran Vs State of Rajasthan

Modu Lal S/O Sukhdev Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalu Ram Meena Son of Kalla Ram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramvilas S/O Gangaram Vs State of Rajasthan